假設性問題

等我話你地知「咩野」係你地通常拒絕回答問題時用架標準句子 - 「假設性問題係唔會答」？

1. This is a question about something which is not true but could be true !


2. There are cases where a hypothetical question can be dismissed, however, it is never true that a hypothetical questions can be dismissed only because it is hypothetical.


3. A hypothetical question is one that is answered only in terms of validity, not soundness.Thus the question is designed to make a number of assumptions, and be answered as if those assumption are true.


4. Normally when someone dismisses a question because it is hypothetical, there is a good chance that he is trying to avoid dealing with a difficult situation and hoping no one will notice.

你地每日都話「假設性問題一律唔答」. Why ? 因為市場充斥著一大批「一流客戶」，但呢批一流客戶係強烈要求「九流」服務 - 即「旁門左道」。更何況我地呢個行業 d 客戶及中間人 - 大部份係缺乏「道德」行為標準，以「假設性問題」套取「真實事故的答案」，繼而再以欺騙手法「偽造一個真實個案」, 意圖詐取 $$$ 既利益。所以，為了保障公司利益，你地採取「逃避策略」「一律唔答」...我唔會話你地錯。我每次係「山頂馬戲團」返工時，見到此類「中間人」，己感到「嘔心」...佢地一樣欺凌「馬戲團」 d 同事。但我唔係「九流」之類，我有「道德標準」, 你地知架 bor。我精通「旁門左道」，使鬼問佢「假設性問題」.....真係要 xyz 滿天星斗...ma ma ma ma ma ma .. xyz#%^&*"?#^&*~...

係今次個 dispute, 我從來冇問呢個同事 any hypothetical question. 我所問架係「合約條文」的詮釋。果位同事冇正式解答我條問題，便一腳以「hypothetical question」踢我走。佢當我係「九流」？我唔怕話你地知，假如我聽話聽教, 聽佢話去搵 CEO 投訴，我會要求呈交「錄音帶記錄」作為當日通話之證據。我唔會俾人屈，事實就係事實。

咩佢原來唔知我個人「衰成點」？我咪係「衰到」好似依家甘「咬」「咬」「咬」。問你地怕未？我係一頭會「咬人」架狗....又或者係一頭會「咬人」架「癲狗」。你地依家先知道我會「咬」「咬」「咬」架都未遲。。。呵呵！！！

佢究竟有冇用下個大腦，佢有冇經 Mr. Horse 批淮先寫呢句說話？佢知唔知道煽動他人去 CEO 度投訴，係分分鐘會累死好多人架？好心佢啦....我顧全大局....唔會同佢癲....因我有「品」 lor！